Your Cart

Close [x]
Plan Price Remove
Total:  $0.00

STEP 2: Who is the plan for?

You don't need to enter a name, but it will help
with your setup

STEP 3: Add a plan to your cart

Google Responds To Privacy Concerns With Unsettlingly Specific Apology

Terrific satire from The Onion. http://tinyurl.com/yja55lx

Chinese cyber theft: Ignore it at our peril.

This article in the New York Times by David Barboza reminds us, once again, that the rise of Chinese expert hacking is real and a threat not only to Chinese citizens and government agencies but to the United States, our allies, our citizens, and our companies

Please Join Me in Supporting Haiti

In this time of terrible need for our fellow world citizens in Haiti, please join me in supporting relief organizations such as the Red Cross by giving at http://www.redcross.org/ or by texting “Haiti” to
90999 (to give $10).  I made a personal donation this morning online to the Red Cross International Response Fund.  Please join me.

Good Op-Ed in WSJ by Jimmy Wales and Andrea Weckerle of CiviliNation

Jimmy Wales of Wikipedia fame and Andrea Weckerle of CiviliNation had an excellent op-ed in the WSJ right before the new year. In it, they call for a more civil online dialogue, making the important point that vicious online attacks can too often silence discussion rather than advance or broaden it. There is always room in a free society for vigorous dialogue and debate. But when one party is attacked–often, online, anonymously–into silence, we can lose the value of the conversation and disagreement.

Some will no doubt respond to Wales and Weckerle with the opinion that their way forward would result in a chilling of speech; change the law or mores online even a smidgeon, the argument would go, and the immediate and necessary result is Stalinism– an icicle where there used to be free speech. The argument goes that anything other than the status quo is censorship. Not true.

Too often, online attacks yield a kind of “life censorship,” in which people are afraid to go about their lives, attend class, go on dates, apply for jobs, participate in online discourse, because they have been victimized on the Internet. In the words of Wales and Weckerle, from the op-ed:

“The Internet is bringing about a revolution in human knowledge and communication, and we have an unprecedented opportunity to make the global conversation more reasonable and productive. But we can only do so if we prevent the worst among us from silencing the best among us with hostility and incivility.”

Supreme Court clerk joins Reputation.com as Chief Privacy Officer and General Counsel (and it ain’t Ideological!)

This article by Adam Liptak of the New York Times notes that Supreme Court clerks have been going into politically-oriented jobs, including politicized law firms and academic institutions that increasingly match the inclinations of their hiring Justices.

We are proud at Reputation.com to have hired Dave Thompson, who just finished his clerkship for Justice Scalia. We think we are the first startup ever to have won a SCOTUS clerk right out of his or her clerkship. Perhaps the authors of the study will take another look at how hiring is trending after all…..

Michael

Questions?

You don’t love it,
you don’t pay.

We believe in our products so strongly we offer a Money Back Guarantee.

Award-winning service & technology

Headquartered in Silicon Valley, we employ an unrivaled customer service team, world-class scientists, and powerful ORM tools created from years of cutting-edge research and development. This year alone, we won awards for both customer service and technological innovation.