The Huffington Post is reporting that Courtney Love has been sued over some of her online posts.

[image]

Some of Courtney Love’s online rants are now in a Los Angeles court.

A fashion designer’s libel and breach of contract lawsuit against the singer includes what she calls several “menacing and disturbing” statements posted on the Internet.

Austin, Texas-based Dawn Simorangkir (Sim-or-AHNG-ker), also known as Boudoir Queen, says Love never paid her for work done. She filed the lawsuit Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court.

The suit cites remarks from Love’s Twitter and MySpace pages, and in the feedback section of Etsy.com. It said Love called Simorangkir a “nasty lying hosebag thief” and accused her of being a drug addict and a prostitute.

Phone messages left for Love’s publicist Thursday and Friday were not immediately returned.

Reputation.com will keep you posted as events unfold and ask that internet users refrain from calling one another “nasty lying hosebag thiefs.”

If you thought that untagged photos of you on Facebook were not going to affect your online reputation, you’ve got another thing coming. According to the New York Times, a new application utilizes facial recognition software to find public, untagged photos online.

From the page:

This one is kinda scary because of how well it works. Face.com’s new Photo Finder application for Facebook helps you automatically discover public photos that you and your friends may have forgotten to tag — and it also lets you track untagged photos of your friends.

Face-recognition technology is itself not new, but Photo Finder’s twist is how it makes use of Facebook’s interface. The social network only shows you photos of yourself containing tags about you — your name and profiled, associated with you in a given photo. Up until now, untagging a photo is how you hide a photo from your Facebook friends — the other option is to use more advanced privacy settings that restrict photo viewing to specific friends, but I’m not sure how many people use that feature.

With Face.com, your friends can bypass such social engineering to directly stalk you, or visa versa as the case may be.

[SNIP]

More than 850 million photos are uploaded every month by Facebook’s 200 million or so users. So if this app becomes popular, expect a surge in the number of these photos that people choose hide behind the more advanced privacy setting. I’m guessing that college students coming back from spring break, for example, might think harder about making a new album like “Beach Party Spring Break 09″ available to just a few friends or a network — but not moms or ex-girlfriends.

As technology continues to advance, it will be incumbent on social networkers to monitor and maintain a consistent online reputation.

The New York Times has an interesting write up of a recent TRUSTe survey that reveals that online privacy is a rising concern for over 90% of online users.

As arguments swirl over online privacy, a new survey indicates the issue is a dominant concern for Americans.

More than 90 percent of respondents called online privacy a “really” or “somewhat” important issue, according to the survey of more than 1,000 Americans conducted by TRUSTe, an organization that monitors the privacy practices of Web sites of companies like I.B.M., Yahoo and WebMD for a fee.

The survey also found that users were not comfortable with data gathering by advertisers to deliver targeted brand messages.

When asked if they were comfortable with behavioral targeting — when advertisers use a person’s browsing history or search history to decide which ad to show them — only 28 percent said they were. More than half said they were not. And more than 75 percent of respondents agreed with the statement, “The Internet is not well regulated, and naïve users can easily be taken advantage of.”

The survey arrives at a fractious time. Debate over behavioral advertising has intensified, with industry groups trying to avoid government intervention by creating their own regulatory standards. Still, some Congressional representatives and the Federal Trade Commission are questioning whether there are enough safeguards around the practice.

Last month, the F.T.C. revised its suggestions for behavioral advertising rules for the industry, proposing, among other measures, that sites disclose when they are participating in behavioral advertising and obtain consumers’ permission to do so.

Reputation.com is committed to protecting online privacy and ensures a safe online experience for students and professionals.

Michael Fertik will be speaking at SXSW (South By SouthWest) this weekend and addressing the emerging trend of digital narcing. In the information age a variety of forces are shaping a voyeristic digital world wherein companies, individuals and governments can compile data to make more accurate decisions, for good or for ill.

From the NSA warrantless wiretaps to GPS targeted advertisements to monitoring flu outbreaks on Google, it is truly a brave new world.

Check out Michael Fertik and other panel speakers this Sunday at 5 if you are in the area.

A recent USA Today article discusses the emerging trend of teenagers sending nude photos of themselves to one another via cellphone or the internet, a phenomenon known as “sexting.” Now, as the courts are stepping in with charges of child pornography, adults and students are being forced to once again educate themselves about the real world dangers of “harmless” online activities.

A growing number of teens are ending up in serious trouble for sending racy photos with their cellphones.

Police have investigated more than two dozen teens in at least six states this year for sending nude images of themselves in cellphone text messages, which can bring a charge of distributing child pornography. Authorities typically are notified by parents or schools about so-called “sexting.”

This week in Spotsylvania, Va., two boys, ages 15 and 18, were charged with solicitation and possession of child porn with intent to distribute after an investigation found they sought nude pictures from three juveniles — one in elementary school.

“It’s absolutely becoming a bigger problem,” says Michelle Collins of the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.

Finding appropriate penalties for this behavior is also a concern for judges, teens and parents:

 

In Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Juvenile Court Judge Thomas O’Malley struggled to figure out what to do with eight teens, 14 to 17, caught trading nude cellphone pictures of themselves. He says the father of one of the girls found the images.

If the 17-year-old who sent the nude photos to an ex-boyfriend were convicted of a child-porn charge, he says, she would be a registered sex offender for 20 years.

“These kids have no record, not even a parking ticket,” says O’Malley, a father of four teens.

He required each to do community service and to ask peers if they knew sexting was a crime. They told O’Malley they surveyed 225 teens; 31 knew.

Reputation.com encourages parents to educate their children about practicing safe online behavior.