<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Online &#8216;Exhibitionists&#8217; Undermine Our Right to a Private Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reputation.com/blog/2010/01/07/report-online-exhibitionists-undermine-our-right-to-a-private-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2010/01/07/report-online-exhibitionists-undermine-our-right-to-a-private-life/</link>
	<description>ReputationDefender Blog &#124; Online Privacy, Online Reputation Management, Identity Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Facebook’s privacy problem: your friends’ settings matter more than yours (or “Facebook, Zuckerberg, and the privacy ecosystem”) : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2010/01/07/report-online-exhibitionists-undermine-our-right-to-a-private-life/comment-page-1/#comment-11154</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook’s privacy problem: your friends’ settings matter more than yours (or “Facebook, Zuckerberg, and the privacy ecosystem”) : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/?p=2295#comment-11154</guid>
		<description>[...] of that decision (e.g., &#8220;Facebook loophole allows extensive data mining&#8220;, &#8220;Online exhibitionists undermine our right to live a quiet life&#8220;), but most analysis has focused on the impact on users&#8217; own choices: are you fully [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of that decision (e.g., &#8220;Facebook loophole allows extensive data mining&#8220;, &#8220;Online exhibitionists undermine our right to live a quiet life&#8220;), but most analysis has focused on the impact on users&#8217; own choices: are you fully [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reputation.com : Facebook&#8217;s privacy problem: social norms or gatekeeper? (or &#8220;Facebook, Zuckerberg, and the privacy ecosystem&#8221;)</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2010/01/07/report-online-exhibitionists-undermine-our-right-to-a-private-life/comment-page-1/#comment-11135</link>
		<dc:creator>Reputation.com : Facebook&#8217;s privacy problem: social norms or gatekeeper? (or &#8220;Facebook, Zuckerberg, and the privacy ecosystem&#8221;)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/?p=2295#comment-11135</guid>
		<description>[...] of that decision (e.g., &#8220;Facebook loophole allows extensive data mining&#8220;, &#8220;Online exhibitionists undermine our right to live a quiet life&#8220;), but most analysis has focused on the impact on users&#8217; own choices: are you fully [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of that decision (e.g., &#8220;Facebook loophole allows extensive data mining&#8220;, &#8220;Online exhibitionists undermine our right to live a quiet life&#8220;), but most analysis has focused on the impact on users&#8217; own choices: are you fully [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

