NEW JERSEY –

Levinson Axelrod is one of the oldest and most prestigious consumer injury law firms in New Jersey. It has been in business since 1939 and has won more than $250 million for its clients in the last 5 years alone.

But you wouldn’t know that by looking at the Google results for the firm’s name.  If you search Google for “Levinson Axelrod” today, the fourth result is a site called “Levinson Axelrod Sucks” at levinsonaxelrod.net (intentionally not linked to avoid making it any more visible in a Google search).

The site is a gripe site built by Edward Heyburn, an employee fired in 2004.  The firm says that Heyburn was fired because he was planning to open his own firm.  Heyburn claims that he was caught in disagreements about the firm’s direction and feels that the firm is not living up to its image of the working man’s protector.

The site lists many alleged problems at the law firm. Heyburn’s site claims that some of the firm’s accomplishments (like “Super Lawyer” status) were actually paid advertising and not independent awards, and that the firm called him just to disrupt him when he was in the delivery room assisting his wife in labor.  The site also highlights recent courtroom losses by Levinson Axelrod lawyers — something that can’t be found on the firm’s official site.

To a consumer law firm, image is everything

A firm like Levinson Axelrod depends on clients who are willing to trust the firm with claims that might be worth millions of dollars. When deciding on which lawyers to pick, clients depend almost entirely on the firm’s image and reputation.

After all, you can’t judge the skill of lawyers just by their names alone — instead, potential clients want to hear about experiences other people have had with a firm, and evaluate the firm’s reputation in the community.  Law firms spend tends of thousands of dollars on branding and image maintenance just to make sure that customers get an impression of strength, skill, and experience in the courtroom.

But all of that careful branding can be undermined by Google.  Potential clients might look at the firm’s website to learn more. But informed consumers will also routinely search for the firm’s name in Google to find out what other people have had to say. They will look for other experiences — positive and negative — that are described on Google before entrusting any firm with a claim that could be worth millions.

Here, the “gripe site” lists many complaints about the law firm.  Some of them might be true, or all of them might be false.  But it’s certain that many consumers won’t take the time to sort out which allegations are true and false; there are plenty of personal injury lawyers in New Jersey, so why take a risk on Levinson Axelrod when there are other firms with pristine reputations?   Maybe consumers should spend more time evaluating the gripe site’s complaints, but for most consumers, any complaint is enough to cause them to just click onto the next law firm’s site.

The same is true for doctors, lawyers, contractors, construction companies, and almost any other service industry: customers rely on  reputation to make the decision to hire a service firm.  And today, Google is the number one source of reputation — whatever Google says about you is what consumers will think about you.

SEO was not enough

Levinson Axelrod has spent a lot of energy on making its website come up first in search engines (“search engine optimization” or “SEO”).  The firm name comes up first in searches for terms like “New Jersey Personal Injury Lawyer,” “NJ injury lawyers” and other targeted keywords.  These are keywords that are worth $20.00 – $30.00 per click because they are very likely to lead to high-paying clients.   One analytics tool estimates that this SEO is worth the same as $15,000 a month in online advertising — or $180,000 a year.

SEO is important, especially to firms that benefit from consumer traffic. But SEO didn’t stop one ex-employee from trashing the firm’s image.  Any potential client that searches Google for “Levinson Axelrod” sees the “Levinson Axelrod Sucks” site right on the first page of results — and right below the firm’s official site. All that SEO value is undermined every time a potential client starts to do his or her due diligence on the firm, starting by searching for more information about the firm through Google.

SEO is designed only to get one or two pages to the top of a Google search; it is not designed to protect a brand or image online.

A lawsuit was not enough

The law firm has sued the ex-employee.  It should come as no surprise that a lawyer saw this problem as a lawsuit waiting to happen.

But the lawsuit hasn’t solved their problem: the web page is still up while they wrangle it out in court.  In fact, the legal conflict has actually drawn more attention to the website: a story of high-powered lawyers fighting each other is a guaranteed draw for reporters (see the Streisand Effect). And, of course, the ex-employee has every incentive to play up the media angle as much as possible.

Online monitoring and Google management: A better answer

If SEO and litigation aren’t enough, what is?  Comprehensive monitoring and Google image management that will push truthful positive information to the top of search results for queries related to your company name or brand.  If positive information fills all the top spots in a search, then false and disparaging information will never appear.

Proactive Google management now — before something goes wrong — can help keep false and negative information from ever reaching the front page of a Google search.  Building positive, truthful content today can block many types of negative information from ever appearing on the first page of a search.  It’s almost like a form of “Google-proofing” your brand — an investment today can stop damage in the future.  And if false information never appears on the front page, then it won’t have power to undermine your brand or spark a media frenzy.  In the case of an former employee’s complaint site, a hidden complaint site is like the ex-employee shouting into the wind: they might spend a lot of energy and vent a bit, but it is not likely to damage your brand.

Learn how you can use tools like MyEdgePro to protect your company’s image from attack today; visit http://www.reputation.com/myedgepro or contact Reputation.com for more information.