Comments on: Analysis: Google’s Online Reputation Management Tips Fall Short http://reputation.com/blog/2009/10/16/analysis-googles-online-reputation-management-tips-fall-short/ ReputationDefender Blog | Online Privacy, Online Reputation Management, Identity Management Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:09:27 +0000 hourly 1 By: Was Google zu Reputationsmanagement sagt | TechBanger.de http://reputation.com/blog/2009/10/16/analysis-googles-online-reputation-management-tips-fall-short/comment-page-1/#comment-9723 Was Google zu Reputationsmanagement sagt | TechBanger.de Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:38:51 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/?p=906#comment-9723 [...] Tipps selbst beschreiben im Grunde Selbstverständlichkeiten, doch interessant ist daran, dass Google darin offiziell Maßnahmen befürwortet, um zu [...] [...] Tipps selbst beschreiben im Grunde Selbstverständlichkeiten, doch interessant ist daran, dass Google darin offiziell Maßnahmen befürwortet, um zu [...]

]]> By: Website Promotion Blog http://reputation.com/blog/2009/10/16/analysis-googles-online-reputation-management-tips-fall-short/comment-page-1/#comment-9646 Website Promotion Blog Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:40:12 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/?p=906#comment-9646 I believe the best practice will be to preemptively handle the reputation damage by some preventive measures instead of trying to outweigh the negative buzz against you. Actually, it might be inevitable to face cases where your reputation is at stake and something unexpected happens to you. Then, Google's post could help somewhat, but it's only in the world of search engines, not social media. That's something that requires different approach to outweigh your negative side by the positive aspects. I believe the best practice will be to preemptively handle the reputation damage by some preventive measures instead of trying to outweigh the negative buzz against you.

Actually, it might be inevitable to face cases where your reputation is at stake and something unexpected happens to you. Then, Google’s post could help somewhat, but it’s only in the world of search engines, not social media. That’s something that requires different approach to outweigh your negative side by the positive aspects.

]]> By: Rob Frappier http://reputation.com/blog/2009/10/16/analysis-googles-online-reputation-management-tips-fall-short/comment-page-1/#comment-9644 Rob Frappier Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:45:57 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/?p=906#comment-9644 Exactly my point Jim. Sometimes, it seems like Google and other search engines reward negative or defamatory content, while ignoring positive contributions. I'm sorry to hear of your problem with Ripoff Report. I recommend speaking with one of our Online Reputation Management consultants (<strong>1-888-720-9980</strong>) to see how Reputation.com could help. Exactly my point Jim. Sometimes, it seems like Google and other search engines reward negative or defamatory content, while ignoring positive contributions. I’m sorry to hear of your problem with Ripoff Report. I recommend speaking with one of our Online Reputation Management consultants (1-888-720-9980) to see how Reputation.com could help.

]]> By: Jim Edwards http://reputation.com/blog/2009/10/16/analysis-googles-online-reputation-management-tips-fall-short/comment-page-1/#comment-9635 Jim Edwards Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:14:14 +0000 http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/?p=906#comment-9635 I cant believe what Google is suggesting. I launched a Google profile, added 6 links and backlinked it and you still can't find it on Internet. On the other side of the coin some anonymous flake posts a libelous comment on Rippoff Report and its in position one or two in thirty seconds? I cant believe what Google is suggesting. I launched a Google profile, added 6 links and backlinked it and you still can’t find it on Internet. On the other side of the coin some anonymous flake posts a libelous comment on Rippoff Report and its in position one or two in thirty seconds?

]]>