<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rosemary Port&#8217;s privacy lawsuit against Google is a guaranteed loser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/rosemary-ports-privacy-lawsuit-against-google-is-a-guaranteed-loser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/rosemary-ports-privacy-lawsuit-against-google-is-a-guaranteed-loser/</link>
	<description>ReputationDefender Blog &#124; Online Privacy, Online Reputation Management, Identity Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: starryluvly.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Internet and Accountability</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/rosemary-ports-privacy-lawsuit-against-google-is-a-guaranteed-loser/comment-page-1/#comment-9395</link>
		<dc:creator>starryluvly.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Internet and Accountability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 09:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/rosemary-ports-privacy-lawsuit-against-google-is-a-guaranteed-loser/#comment-9395</guid>
		<description>[...] idiot, in my opinion. What doesn&#8217;t seem to be reported is the fact that Rosemary Port was using BLOGGER which is a Google subsidiary. Thus, they are not breaking any privacy policy because Miss Port AGREED to their terms of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] idiot, in my opinion. What doesn&#8217;t seem to be reported is the fact that Rosemary Port was using BLOGGER which is a Google subsidiary. Thus, they are not breaking any privacy policy because Miss Port AGREED to their terms of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

