<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 myths about the Liskula Cohen versus Google &#8220;skank&#8221; decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/</link>
	<description>ReputationDefender Blog &#124; Online Privacy, Online Reputation Management, Identity Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reputation.com : Understanding Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-14243</link>
		<dc:creator>Reputation.com : Understanding Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-14243</guid>
		<description>[...] against someone who is defaming them online. Quite to the contrary, as demonstrated in ex-model Liskula Cohen&#8217;s lawsuit against Google last year, you can sue an Internet company to reveal the identity of someone who is attacking you online. Of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] against someone who is defaming them online. Quite to the contrary, as demonstrated in ex-model Liskula Cohen&#8217;s lawsuit against Google last year, you can sue an Internet company to reveal the identity of someone who is attacking you online. Of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reputation Management, Internet Privacy, and Social Media Quick Hits : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-11355</link>
		<dc:creator>Reputation Management, Internet Privacy, and Social Media Quick Hits : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-11355</guid>
		<description>[...] to an article in the New York Post, in light of the Liskula Cohen v. Google ruling (which we have covered extensively here at the Reputation.com Blog), more and more victims of anonymous online attacks are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to an article in the New York Post, in light of the Liskula Cohen v. Google ruling (which we have covered extensively here at the Reputation.com Blog), more and more victims of anonymous online attacks are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Frappier</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-11351</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Frappier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-11351</guid>
		<description>FYI - In moderating this post, I deleted a couple of comments that were straying from the analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI &#8211; In moderating this post, I deleted a couple of comments that were straying from the analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reputation.com : Reputation Management, Internet Privacy, and Social Media Quick Hits</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-11341</link>
		<dc:creator>Reputation.com : Reputation Management, Internet Privacy, and Social Media Quick Hits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-11341</guid>
		<description>[...] to an article in the New York Post, in light of the Liskula Cohen v. Google ruling (which we have covered extensively here at the Reputation.com Blog), more and more victims of anonymous online attacks are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to an article in the New York Post, in light of the Liskula Cohen v. Google ruling (which we have covered extensively here at the Reputation.com Blog), more and more victims of anonymous online attacks are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reputation.com : The Decade in Review: Wrapping Up 2000-2009</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-10880</link>
		<dc:creator>Reputation.com : The Decade in Review: Wrapping Up 2000-2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-10880</guid>
		<description>[...] the problem of defamation online hasn&#8217;t abated. While some victims of anonymous slander have successfully argued their cases in court, the vast majority of individuals don&#8217;t have the time and resources needed to fight back [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the problem of defamation online hasn&#8217;t abated. While some victims of anonymous slander have successfully argued their cases in court, the vast majority of individuals don&#8217;t have the time and resources needed to fight back [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liskula Cohen case reminder: Consider the source &#124; STL Social Media Guy</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9256</link>
		<dc:creator>Liskula Cohen case reminder: Consider the source &#124; STL Social Media Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-9256</guid>
		<description>[...] 5 myths about the Liskula Cohen versus Google &#8220;skank&#8221; decision Reputation.com Blog &#124; August 27, 2009 Nice summary of some of the issues that have been discussed in this case. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5 myths about the Liskula Cohen versus Google &#8220;skank&#8221; decision Reputation.com Blog | August 27, 2009 Nice summary of some of the issues that have been discussed in this case. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 myths about the Liskula Cohen versus Google “skank” decision : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9210</link>
		<dc:creator>5 myths about the Liskula Cohen versus Google “skank” decision : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-9210</guid>
		<description>[...] Myth 2: Google is on the hook  (link here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Myth 2: Google is on the hook  (link here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reputation.com Blog : Rosemary Port&#8217;s privacy lawsuit against Google is a guaranteed loser</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9204</link>
		<dc:creator>Reputation.com Blog : Rosemary Port&#8217;s privacy lawsuit against Google is a guaranteed loser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-9204</guid>
		<description>[...] As legions of other chattering experts have said, Rosemary Port&#8217;s lawsuit is a guaranteed loser. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As legions of other chattering experts have said, Rosemary Port&#8217;s lawsuit is a guaranteed loser. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by SlashTopics</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9201</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by SlashTopics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/08/27/5-myths-about-the-liskula-cohen-versus-google-skank-decision/#comment-9201</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by SlashTopics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by SlashTopics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

