<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liskula Cohen Google Lawsuit &#8211; Court Ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/19/model-wins-defamation-suit-google-forced-to-reveal-anonymous-blogger/liskula-cohen-google-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/19/model-wins-defamation-suit-google-forced-to-reveal-anonymous-blogger/liskula-cohen-google-lawsuit/</link>
	<description>ReputationDefender Blog &#124; Online Privacy, Online Reputation Management, Identity Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ‘Skank’ Blogger Sues Google for $15M, Claims Violation of Her Right to Privacy : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/19/model-wins-defamation-suit-google-forced-to-reveal-anonymous-blogger/liskula-cohen-google-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-9175</link>
		<dc:creator>‘Skank’ Blogger Sues Google for $15M, Claims Violation of Her Right to Privacy : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/liskula-cohen-google-lawsuit.pdf#comment-9175</guid>
		<description>[...] we first reported on the Liskula Cohen defamation lawsuit (now popularly known as the &#8220;Skank Case&#8221;), we knew the case would have major [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we first reported on the Liskula Cohen defamation lawsuit (now popularly known as the &#8220;Skank Case&#8221;), we knew the case would have major [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legal impact of the Liskula Cohen court order (the “skank” decision) : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/19/model-wins-defamation-suit-google-forced-to-reveal-anonymous-blogger/liskula-cohen-google-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-9029</link>
		<dc:creator>Legal impact of the Liskula Cohen court order (the “skank” decision) : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/liskula-cohen-google-lawsuit.pdf#comment-9029</guid>
		<description>[...] we previously reported, a New York trial court in Manhattan has issued an order (linkable full text -or- PDF full text) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we previously reported, a New York trial court in Manhattan has issued an order (linkable full text -or- PDF full text) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Model Wins Defamation Suit, Google Forced to Reveal Anonymous Blogger : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/08/19/model-wins-defamation-suit-google-forced-to-reveal-anonymous-blogger/liskula-cohen-google-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-9028</link>
		<dc:creator>Model Wins Defamation Suit, Google Forced to Reveal Anonymous Blogger : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/liskula-cohen-google-lawsuit.pdf#comment-9028</guid>
		<description>[...] Does this ruling mean the end of anonymous bashing online? Probably not. However, considering the long odds Cohen faced in this case, Judge Madden&#8217;s affirmative ruling could play an important part in the future of Internet privacy and defamation law. At the very least, the ruling should encourage individuals to use better judgment about what they post online. As this story develops, Reputation.com will continue to provide coverage and analysis of the decision. For the full text of the court ruling, follow this link. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does this ruling mean the end of anonymous bashing online? Probably not. However, considering the long odds Cohen faced in this case, Judge Madden&#8217;s affirmative ruling could play an important part in the future of Internet privacy and defamation law. At the very least, the ruling should encourage individuals to use better judgment about what they post online. As this story develops, Reputation.com will continue to provide coverage and analysis of the decision. For the full text of the court ruling, follow this link. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

