<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: We Don’t Share Data With Third Parties (But We Kind of, Sort of Do).</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reputation.com/blog/2009/06/03/google-we-don%e2%80%99t-share-data-with-third-parties-but-we-kind-of-sort-of-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/06/03/google-we-don%e2%80%99t-share-data-with-third-parties-but-we-kind-of-sort-of-do/</link>
	<description>ReputationDefender Blog &#124; Online Privacy, Online Reputation Management, Identity Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is Google’s Redesign About Swifter Search or More Money? : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/06/03/google-we-don%e2%80%99t-share-data-with-third-parties-but-we-kind-of-sort-of-do/comment-page-1/#comment-9337</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google’s Redesign About Swifter Search or More Money? : Michael Fertik - Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Reputation.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/06/03/google-we-don%e2%80%99t-share-data-with-third-parties-but-we-kind-of-sort-of-do/#comment-9337</guid>
		<description>[...] this make Google a bad company? Certainly not (at least compared to some other things we know). Should it affect how individuals judge Google search results? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this make Google a bad company? Certainly not (at least compared to some other things we know). Should it affect how individuals judge Google search results? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reputation.com Blog : Is Google&#8217;s Redesign About Swifter Search or More Money?</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/06/03/google-we-don%e2%80%99t-share-data-with-third-parties-but-we-kind-of-sort-of-do/comment-page-1/#comment-9319</link>
		<dc:creator>Reputation.com Blog : Is Google&#8217;s Redesign About Swifter Search or More Money?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/06/03/google-we-don%e2%80%99t-share-data-with-third-parties-but-we-kind-of-sort-of-do/#comment-9319</guid>
		<description>[...] this make Google a bad company? Certainly not (at least compared to some other things we know). Should it affect how individuals judge Google search results? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this make Google a bad company? Certainly not (at least compared to some other things we know). Should it affect how individuals judge Google search results? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reputation.com Blog : Is PageRank for People the Future of Google?</title>
		<link>http://reputation.com/blog/2009/06/03/google-we-don%e2%80%99t-share-data-with-third-parties-but-we-kind-of-sort-of-do/comment-page-1/#comment-7929</link>
		<dc:creator>Reputation.com Blog : Is PageRank for People the Future of Google?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reputationdefenderblog.com/2009/06/03/google-we-don%e2%80%99t-share-data-with-third-parties-but-we-kind-of-sort-of-do/#comment-7929</guid>
		<description>[...] as much as we criticize Google here at the Reputation.com Blog, even we can&#8217;t dispute the company&#8217;s considerable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as much as we criticize Google here at the Reputation.com Blog, even we can&#8217;t dispute the company&#8217;s considerable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

